From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrow v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Feb 23, 2022
5:20-CV-00404-M (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2022)

Opinion

5:20-CV-00404-M

02-23-2022

AVERY MORROW, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

RICHARD E. MYERS, II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DE 20, 23. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. entered a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”), recommending that the court grant Plaintiffs motion, deny Defendant's motion, and remand the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. DE 25. To date, no objections have been filed.

Judge Jones issued the M&R on February 4, 2022. Accordingly, objections were due on or before February 18, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2); Local Civil Rule 72.4(b). The parties' motions and M&R were submitted to this court for disposition on February 22, 2022.

A magistrate judge's recommendation carries no presumptive weight. The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the... recommendation[ ]... receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); accord Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 271 (1976). The court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id. § 636(b)(1). Absent a specific and timely objection, the court reviews only for “clear error" and need not give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

Upon careful review of the M&R and the record presented, and finding no clear error, the court ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own. For the reasons stated therein, Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings [DE 20] is GRANTED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [DE 23] is DENIED, and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the M&R and this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morrow v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Feb 23, 2022
5:20-CV-00404-M (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Morrow v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:AVERY MORROW, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2022

Citations

5:20-CV-00404-M (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2022)

Citing Cases

Morrow v. O'Malley

On February 4, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. issued a memorandum and…