From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 16, 2003
116 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81871

September 16, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Osage County, Hon. Jeffrey W. Schaeperkoetter.

Kent Denzel, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary R. Russell, JJ.



ORDER


James Morrison (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Movant was convicted of felonious restraint, Section 565.120, RSMo 2000, and was sentenced to six years imprisonment. On appeal, Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel presented the GPS evidence which showed an unaccounted for seven hour period which included the time of the crime.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error was not preserved. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Morrison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 16, 2003
116 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Morrison v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 16, 2003

Citations

116 S.W.3d 710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)