From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Madden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 7, 2024
5:22-cv-00925-KK-MAA (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00925-KK-MAA

02-07-2024

ANTHONY MORRISON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also has reviewed Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, filed on January 8, 2024 (“Objections”). (ECF No. 21.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. The Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. The Court finds no defect of law, fact, or logic in the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, and overrules the Objections.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Morrison v. Madden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 7, 2024
5:22-cv-00925-KK-MAA (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Morrison v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MORRISON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-00925-KK-MAA (C.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)