From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morrison v. Boise Cascade

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 1976
556 P.2d 726 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 95247, CA 6867

Argued November 19, 1976.

Affirmed December 6, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County, Jena V. Schlegel, Judge.

Harold W. Adams, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson Schwabe, Michael D. Hoffman and Roger A. Luedtke, Portland.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


The referee found that claimant suffered from a compensable occupational disease of the back. The Workmen's Compensation Board denied the claim, however, because they found that claimant was not credible and because there was insufficient medical evidence to support a finding of compensable occupational disease. The trial court affirmed the denial and, having reviewed the record, we too affirm the denial. Jenkins v. SAIF, 21 Or. App. 447, 451, 535 P.2d 124 (1975).

At the hearing claimant admitted previous falsifications concerning the cause of his condition.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Morrison v. Boise Cascade

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 1976
556 P.2d 726 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Morrison v. Boise Cascade

Case Details

Full title:MORRISON, Appellant, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 6, 1976

Citations

556 P.2d 726 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
556 P.2d 726

Citing Cases

Watson v. Boise Cascade Corp.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Morrison v. Boise Cascade, 27 Or. App. 635, 556 P.2d 726 (1976).…