From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Kuehl

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 4, 2022
2:20-cv-11508-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-11508-VBF-PD

04-04-2022

DR. DERRICK N. MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. SHEILA KUEHL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint and the action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Morris v. Kuehl

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 4, 2022
2:20-cv-11508-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Morris v. Kuehl

Case Details

Full title:DR. DERRICK N. MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. SHEILA KUEHL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 4, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-11508-VBF-PD (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2022)