From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Dorfmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice is not applicable to an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, because it is not an action brought to recover a debt or liquidated demand. ( 103 Park Avenue Co. v. Exchange Buffet Corporation, 203 App. Div. 739; Securities Acceptance Corporation v. Kane Co., Inc., 119 Misc. 354; Lowe v. Plainfield Trust Co., 216 App. Div. 72.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morris v. Dorfmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Morris v. Dorfmann

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL MORRIS, Respondent, v. DAVID W. DORFMANN, Appellant, and GRETTO LE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)