holding that the "district court properly dismissed the claims against the Michigan State Housing Development Authority on Eleventh Amendment grounds."
Summary of this case from Hamad v. Mich. State Hous. Dev. Auth.No. 90-2190.
September 12, 1991.
Appeal from W.D.Mich.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed in Part, Remanded in Part.
holding that the "district court properly dismissed the claims against the Michigan State Housing Development Authority on Eleventh Amendment grounds."
Summary of this case from Hamad v. Mich. State Hous. Dev. Auth.holding that "nothing in the Fair Housing Act . . . can be construed as a congressional abrogation of Michigan's Eleventh Amendment immunity"
Summary of this case from Brooks v. Oakland Univ.In Morris, a state court had upheld a landlord's eviction of a tenant based on the tenant's violation of the terms of his lease.
Summary of this case from Gueye v. TowerFull title:Morris v. Dehaan
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Sep 12, 1991
GVSU and GVSU BOR have not consented to suit under the FHA or PWDCRA, and neither statute abrogates the…
Tranchmontagne v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev.Plaintiff fails to establish that any of these statutes waives HUD's sovereign immunity in this case. See,…