From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 23, 1958
104 S.E.2d 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958)

Opinion

37174.

DECIDED JUNE 23, 1958.

Appellate procedure. Walker Superior Court. Before Judge Davis. March 17, 1958.

Frank M. Gleason, for plaintiff in error.

Geo. P. Shaw, Shaw Shaw, Strang, Fletcher Carriger, Pittman, Kinney Pope, contra.


The only assignments of error contained in the bill of exceptions in this case are to two orders sustaining the general demurrer of the respective defendants. Both of these orders allowed the plaintiff 10 days in which to amend, and one of them provided that upon the plaintiff's failure to file an amendment within the time specified, the petition should stand dismissed without further order of court. Under these facts, the ruling in Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 ( 76 S.E.2d 141), is directly applicable. In that case, this court held: "Code § 81-1001, as amended by the act of 1952 (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243), provides in part as follows: `Where the court sustains any or all demurrers to pleading, and allows time for the filing of an amendment, such judgment or order shall not be subject to exception or review, but the court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the judgment allowing time for amendment. Parties shall have the right to amend at any time prior to the rendition of such latter judgment.' Accordingly, as stated in Community Theaters Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 ( 73 S.E.2d 104): `The act requires that where a demurrer to pleadings is sustained and in the judgment time is allowed in which an amendment may be filed, such judgment on demurrer is not subject to exception or review and is therefore not a final judgment.' See also Browning v. Hirsch, 87 Ga. App. 576 ( 75 S.E.2d 43); Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 ( 73 S.E.2d 106); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (2) ( 73 S.E.2d 345)," and Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 ( 73 S.E.2d 102); Ramey v. Pritchett, 90 Ga. App. 745 (1) ( 84 S.E.2d 305). Accordingly, the writ of error must be

Dismissed. Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

DECIDED JUNE 23, 1958.


Summaries of

Morris v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 23, 1958
104 S.E.2d 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958)
Case details for

Morris v. Cochran

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS v. COCHRAN et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 23, 1958

Citations

104 S.E.2d 544 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958)
104 S.E.2d 544

Citing Cases

Stuart v. Berry

Code (Ann.) § 81-1001; Holliday v. Pope, 205 Ga. 301, 308 ( 53 S.E.2d 350); Hunter v. Ogletree, 212 Ga. 38 (…

Morris v. Bell

Other questions in this case have been adjudicated by this court on two previous occasions. See Morris v.…