From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morris Plan Co. v. Heinz

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Dec 7, 1934
2 Cal.App.2d 689 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)

Opinion

Docket No. 1556.

December 7, 1934.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellant.

Wm. J.M. Heinz, in pro. per., and McFadden Holden for Respondent.


[1] This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The certificate of the county clerk which has been filed in support of the motion shows that the judgment was rendered on December 28, 1933; that notice of appeal therefrom was filed by appellant on March 22, 1934; that no proceedings for the settlement of a bill of exceptions or for the preparation of a reporter's transcript to be used on the appeal are pending in the trial court and that the time for instituting such proceedings has expired. No showing in opposition to the motion has been made by appellant. Respondent's motion for dismissal of the appeal should therefore be granted. ( Steffey v. Standard Stations, Inc., 131 Cal.App. 202 [ 20 P.2d 971].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Morris Plan Co. v. Heinz

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Dec 7, 1934
2 Cal.App.2d 689 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
Case details for

Morris Plan Co. v. Heinz

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS PLAN COMPANY OF ORANGE COUNTY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WM…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 7, 1934

Citations

2 Cal.App.2d 689 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
38 P.2d 199