From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morning Star, LLC v. Canter

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:22-CV-04973-JVS (MARx) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-CV-04973-JVS (MARx)

05-30-2024

Morning Star LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Plaintiffs, v. Keith B. Canter, Trustee of The Canter Schoen Family Trust U/D/T March 17, 2015; and Karen Elise Schoen, Trustee of The Canter Schoen Family Trust U/D/T March 17, 2015; and DOES 1-50, inclusive. Defendants. Keith B. Canter and Karen Elise Schoen, Trustees of The Canter Schoen Family Trust U/T/D March 17, 2015; Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Morning Star LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; et al. Counterclaim Defendants


FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having considered the objections of the parties (Dkt. Nos. 204, 205), the Court enters the following judgment. Each parties' positions are reserved for appeal.

I. JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. No. 201) dated April 25, 2024, the Court hereby enters JUDGMENT in favor of Morning Star, LLC (“Morning Star”) and against Keith B. Canter, Trustee of The Canter Schoen Family Trust U/D/T March 17, 2015; and Karen Elise Schoen, Trustee of The Canter Schoen Family Trust U/D/T March 17, 2015 (collectively, “Trustees”) with respect to the First and only cause of action in the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 15); namely, breach of Article II, Section 3 of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for Tract No. 45585 recorded on August 24, 1994, in the official records of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as Document No. 94-1566821 (hereinafter, the “1994 Restrictive Covenant”).

For the reasons set forth in this Court's orders with respect to the Motion for Summary Judgment on Trustees' counterclaim (Dkt. Nos. 121, 134), the Court hereby enters JUDGMENT against Morning Star, and in favor of Trustees with respect to the First and only cause of action in the Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 48); namely, breach of Article II, Section 2 of the 1994 Restrictive Covenant. Prior to trial, Trustees withdrew and dismissed their claim for monetary damages against Morning Star stated in their Counterclaim. Thus, Trustees shall take nothing on any such claim for monetary damages.

The preliminary injunction previously issued in this action is hereby vacated.

II. PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST TRUSTEES

A. Trustees, and their principals, officers, directors, members, partners, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all successor owners of 6362 Sea Star Drive, Malibu, California (APN No. 4469-047-016) (“Lot 16”), and all other persons acting in concert or participating with any of them (collectively, “Enjoined Parties”), are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED and shall:

i. immediately cease any and all occupancy, habitation, and use of any and all improvements greater than one story on Lot 16, including without limitation the second story bedroom unit located above the first story garage and any structures or improvements of any kind, size or type, associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, located on Lot 16 (the “Second Story Improvements”);

ii. within 120 days of this Order, Trustees shall cause demolition and removal of the Second Story Improvements to be completed, and upon application by any party, the Court may appoint a neutral inspector to ensure the premises are in compliance with the Court's Order;

iii. the Second Story Improvements must be demolished and removed from Lot 16 in their entirety, and Trustees shall not satisfy the orders contained herein by converting, redefining, or reclassifying the Second Story Improvements, including the second story bedroom unit located above the first story garage, to a first story structure, including by removing, modifying, or reclassifying the improvements located beneath the Second Story Improvements;

iv. this injunction shall remain in effect as to all parties, their successors and assigns until modified or vacated upon a showing of changed circumstances or full satisfaction of the terms of this injunction.

III. PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST MORNING STAR

A. Morning Star and its members, agents, representatives and all those acting on behalf of or in concert with it, including but not limited to Patrick Farshad Nazemi, or any successor-in-interest is hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED and shall, within 60 days of the date that this Judgment becomes final, submit a plan to the City of Malibu which includes the removal of all fencing, barriers, or landscaping in the northerly 10 feet of Lot 17 and which in all other respects complies with the terms of the 1994 Restrictive Covenant. Morning Star or any successor-in-interest shall thereafter act expeditiously to obtain approval of such plan and to perform the required work necessary to bring the fencing, barriers, and landscaping in conformity with the terms of Article II, Section 2 of the 1994 Restrictive Covenant.

i. this injunction shall remain in effect as to all parties, their successors and assigns until modified or vacated upon a showing of changed circumstances or full satisfaction of the terms of this injunction.

IV. REPORTING REQUIREMENT

Trustees and Morning Star shall file with the Court, within thirty (30) days after service of this Judgment, and every thirty (30) days thereafter, until such time as the requirements of the Judgment have been fully satisfied, a joint status report in writing under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Trustees and Morning Star are complying with this Permanent Injunction.

V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION

This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter in law and equity for purposes of enforcing and/or adjudicating claims of violations of this Judgment and Permanent Injunctions.

VI. DOE DEFENDANTS

The Doe Defendants 1-50 are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

VII. RETURN OF BOND

The $50,000 cash bond posted by Morning Star in connection with the Preliminary Injunction issued by this Court shall be returned to Morning Star.

VIII. ATTORNEYS' FEES

The Court orders Morning Star and Trustees to file simultaneous opening briefs on the issue as to the identity of the prevailing party(ies) for purposes of the attorneys' fee provision of the 1994 Restrictive Covenant and the amount of any such award. The opening briefs shall be filed simultaneously on June 14, 2024. Each party's reply brief shall be filed simultaneously on June 28, 2024.

The opening and reply briefs shall be no more than 12 pages each, excluding purely evidentiary attachments and declarations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morning Star, LLC v. Canter

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:22-CV-04973-JVS (MARx) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Morning Star, LLC v. Canter

Case Details

Full title:Morning Star LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Plaintiffs, v. Keith…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

2:22-CV-04973-JVS (MARx) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)