From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morman v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Aug 31, 2023
Civil Action 4:20-cv-4365-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-cv-4365-TMC

08-31-2023

Teresa Morman, Plaintiff, v. Kilolo Kijakazi,[1] Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Timothy M. Cain, United States District Judge

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Teresa Morman's amended motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 48). Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $22,729.75, which Plaintiff contends represents 25% of the total back benefits awarded to Plaintiff. (ECF No. 48-1 at 5, 6). The Commissioner has filed a response informing the court that she does not object to Plaintiff's motion for fees. (ECF No. 49).

Pursuant to Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002), in reviewing a request for attorney's fees under § 406(b), a court must look first to the contingent fee agreement and assess its reasonableness. A reduction in the contingent fee may be appropriate when (1) the fee is out of line with the character of the representation and the results achieved; (2) counsel's delay caused past-due benefits to accumulate during the pendency of the case in court, or (3) past-due benefits are large in comparison to the amount of time counsel spent on the case. Id.

Based upon a review of the petition and these factors, the court finds that an award of $22,729.75 is reasonable. Pursuant to a contingency fee agreement, Plaintiff agreed to pay counsel twenty-five percent (25%) of any past-due benefits. (ECF Nos. 48-1 at 1; 48-2). Plaintiff was awarded a total of $90,919.00 in back benefits. (ECF No. 48-4 at 1). Twenty-five percent (25%) of this award equates to $22,729.75, of which the Commission withheld $16,952.50 and paid plaintiff's counsel the remaining $5,777.25 as administrative fees. See id. at 1-2. However, because the Administrative Law Judge's decision was vacated, including the award of administrative fees, the Commission has indicated that Plaintiff's counsel now holds the $5,777.25 in escrow pending the court's ruling on Plaintiff's motion. Id. at 2.

In compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), counsel's requested fee does not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total past-due benefits. Furthermore, the requested attorney's fee is reasonable given the hours counsel expended working on this matter at the court level. See (ECF Nos. 48-1 at 4-6); see also Wrenn v. Astrue, 525 F.3d 931, 937 (10th Cir. 2008) (noting that under § 406(b) the court makes fee awards only for work done before the court). Additionally, Plaintiff's counsel achieved a successful result without any unreasonable delay. In light of counsel's specialized skill in social security disability cases, the attorney's fee award does not amount to a windfall. Cf. Brown v. Barnhart, 270 F.Supp.2d 769, 772-73 (W.D. Va. 2003).

Therefore, based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's amended motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 48) is Granted, and Plaintiff is awarded a total of $22,729.75 in attorney's fees.

“Fee awards may be made under both [EAJA and § 406(b)], but the claimant's attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee[,] . . . up to the point the claimant receives 100 percent of the past-due benefits.” Gisbrecht, 535 U.S. at 796 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Plaintiff was previously awarded $3,340.11 in attorney's fees under the EAJA in this action. (ECF No. 38). Accordingly, Plaintiff's counsel is to refund to the Plaintiff the previously ordered EAJA fees of $3,340.11 immediately after he receives the payment of the § 406(b) fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morman v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Aug 31, 2023
Civil Action 4:20-cv-4365-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Morman v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:Teresa Morman, Plaintiff, v. Kilolo Kijakazi,[1] Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-cv-4365-TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2023)