From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
1:20-cv-00029-ADA-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00029-ADA-GSA-PC

06-12-2023

MATTHEW WILKE MORGAN, Plaintiffs, v. VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER (ECF NO. 10.)

GARY S. AUSTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Matthew Wilke Morgan (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 14, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 30.) On June 8, 2023, the Court issued an order granting the motion to dismiss in part. (ECF No. 39.) This case now proceeds against defendants Warden Raythel Fisher, Jr. and Culinary Worker Moosbauer (“Defendants”) for violation of Plaintiff's right to exercise his religion under the First Amendment, subjecting Plaintiff to adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are required to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 20 days of the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Valley State Prison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
1:20-cv-00029-ADA-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Morgan v. Valley State Prison

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW WILKE MORGAN, Plaintiffs, v. VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 12, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-00029-ADA-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)