From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
May 12, 2014
143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–829.

2014-05-12

Javarus Lamont MORGAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


It appearing to this Court that petitioner has filed the instant pro se notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction while represented by counsel, the notice is hereby stricken as an unauthorized pleading, and the cause is dismissed. See, e.g., Gilbert v. Singletary, 632 So.2d 1104, 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(refusing to entertain pro se habeas petition where petitioner was represented by counsel and direct appeal was pending; “[A] party may not be simultaneously represented by counsel and yet file pro se pleadings or petitions in the same case.”); Thompson v. State, 615 So.2d 737, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)(holding that pro se motion for discharge filed when defendant was represented by counsel is a nullity); Salser v. State, 582 So.2d 12, 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)(same).


Summaries of

Morgan v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
May 12, 2014
143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Morgan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Javarus Lamont MORGAN, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: May 12, 2014

Citations

143 So. 3d 920 (Fla. 2014)