From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 30, 1991
817 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 1022-91.

October 30, 1991.

Appeal from the 54th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, George Allen, J.

Walter M. Reaves, Jr., West, for appellant.

Paul E. Gartner, Jr., Dist. Atty., Tanya S. Dohoney and Gina Parker, Asst. Dist. Attys., Linda M. Gassaway, Waco, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW


Appellant was convicted by a jury of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal he contended that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to make comments on his failure to testify. The Court of Appeals agreed that there was error but held such to be harmless under Tex.R.App.Pro. 81(b)(2). Morgan v. State, 816 S.W.2d 98 (Tex.App.-Waco, 1991). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review and this Court has declined to grant review.

As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App. 1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant's petition for discretionary review.


Summaries of

Morgan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 30, 1991
817 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)
Case details for

Morgan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Billy Wayne MORGAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Oct 30, 1991

Citations

817 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

However, an objection is not required until the basis of relief becomes apparent. Johnson v. State, 878…