From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2020
Case No. 5:19-CV-02191 (VEB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5:19-CV-02191 (VEB)

10-21-2020

MATRIKA MISSOURI MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs.

DATED this 21st of October 2020

/s/Victor E. Bianchini

VICTOR E. BIANCHINI

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Morgan v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 21, 2020
Case No. 5:19-CV-02191 (VEB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Morgan v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MATRIKA MISSOURI MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 5:19-CV-02191 (VEB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)

Citing Cases

Ponce v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

(“Thus, while the new regulations ask the ALJ to explain, at a minimum, how the ALJ considered the…

Moua v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

(“Thus, while the new regulations ask the ALJ to explain, at a minimum, how the ALJ considered the…