From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Menasha

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 2008
481 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion

No. 135861.

July 2, 2008.

Court of Appeals No. 272837.


Summary Dispositions July 2, 2008:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the November 15, 2007, judgment remanding this case to the Allegan Circuit Court "for entry of judgment in favor of [the third-party defendant] Fairhaven [Wood Harvesting, Inc.]." We do not disturb the Court of Appeals ruling concerning third-party plaintiff Menasha Corporation's argument under Article 9 of the Chip Purchase Agreement. But the third-party complaint further alleged that the third-party defendant breached its obligation under Article 10 of the Chip Purchase Agreement to procure and maintain insurance coverage. Because the circuit court has not yet resolved this aspect of the third-party complaint, we remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Menasha

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 2, 2008
481 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

Morgan v. Menasha

Case Details

Full title:ERNIE MORGAN and KATHY MORGAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MENASHA…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 2, 2008

Citations

481 Mich. 942 (Mich. 2008)
751 N.W.2d 41