Opinion
Decided June, 1891.
The justice of an amendment changing the form of action is a question of fact determinable at the trial term.
CASE. The plaintiff excepted to the denial of his motion to amend by adding a count in debt.
O. S. Cormier, for the plaintiff.
W. S. D. R. Pierce, for the defendant.
Exception overruled. Wendell v. Mugridge, 19 N.H. 109, 113, 114; Baker v. Davis, 22 N.H. 27, 33-35; Piper v. Hilliard, 58 N.H. 198; Barker v. Savage, 58 N.H. 252; Redding v. Dodge, 59 N.H. 98; Edes v. Herrick, 61 N.H. 60, 61; Garvin v. Legery, 61 N.H. 153; Logue v. Clark, 62 N.H. 184, 185; Cocheco Aq. Association v. Railroad, 62 N.H. 345; Langdon v. Buchanan, 62 N.H. 657, 661; Hardy v. Nye, 63 N.H. 612; Gagnon v. Connor, 64 N.H. 276; Morse v. Whitcher, 64 N.H. 591; Gage v. Gage, ante, pp. 282, 292.
CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.