Opinion
No. 70655
06-27-2016
BAYZLE MORGAN, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or, alternatively, prohibition challenging a district court order denying a motion to continue the trial in the underlying proceedings, which is scheduled to begin on Monday, June 27, 2016. Petitioner has also filed a motion for stay, and real party in interest has filed an opposition. Having considered the documents and arguments presented in this matter, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we
We note that petitioner's motion was denominated an "emergency," but counsel failed to comply with the requirements set forth in NRAP 27(e), which governs such motions.
The motion for stay is denied as moot. --------
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge
The Law Office of Daniel M. Bunin
Dayvid J. Figler
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk