From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morgan v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 7, 2010
07-CV-1789-ST (D. Or. Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

07-CV-1789-ST.

October 7, 2010

MERRILL SCHNEIDER, Schneider Law Offices, Portland, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#35) on July 29, 2010, in which she recommends this Court grant Plaintiff Steven Morgan's Unopposed Motion (#32) for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 406(b) in the sum of $11,745.25 to be offset by $4,883.01 awarded to Plaintiff's counsel on July 6, 2009, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#35). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion (#32) for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 406(b) in the sum of $11,745.25 to be offset by $4,883.01 awarded to Plaintiff's counsel on July 6, 2009, pursuant to the EAJA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Morgan v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Oct 7, 2010
07-CV-1789-ST (D. Or. Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Morgan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MORGAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

07-CV-1789-ST (D. Or. Oct. 7, 2010)