From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreno v. Trs. of Columbia Univ.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
161 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

6525 Index 155112/15

05-10-2018

Candida MORENO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. The TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN the CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant–Appellant.

Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant. Saftler & Bacher, PLLC, New York (James W. Bacher of counsel), for respondent.


Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for appellant.

Saftler & Bacher, PLLC, New York (James W. Bacher of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2017, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff alleges that she slipped and fell on a pathway on defendant Columbia University's campus, which was covered by snow over a layer of ice. Defendant established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting certified climatological data showing that a storm was in progress at the time of plaintiff's fall so that its duty to take reasonable measures to remedy dangerous conditions caused by the storm was suspended (see Valentine v. City of New York, 86 A.D.2d 381, 383, 449 N.Y.S.2d 991 [1st Dept. 1982], affd 57 N.Y.2d 932, 457 N.Y.S.2d 240, 443 N.E.2d 488 [1982] ; Kinberg v. New York City Tr. Auth., 99 A.D.3d 583, 952 N.Y.S.2d 540 [1st Dept. 2012] ; Pippo v. City of New York, 43 A.D.3d 303, 304, 842 N.Y.S.2d 367 [1st Dept. 2007] ).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The opinion of plaintiff's expert was too speculative to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant's snow removal efforts involved insufficient salt or ice melt materials, resulting in the creation of new ice that was covered by the snow (see Rivas v. New York City Hous. Auth., 140 A.D.3d 580, 581, 34 N.Y.S.3d 443 [1st Dept. 2016] ; Bi Fang Zhou v. 131 Chrystie St. Realty Corp., 125 A.D.3d 429, 430, 3 N.Y.S.3d 21 [1st Dept. 2015] ).


Summaries of

Moreno v. Trs. of Columbia Univ.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2018
161 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Moreno v. Trs. of Columbia Univ.

Case Details

Full title:Candida Moreno, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The Trustees of Columbia…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2018

Citations

161 A.D.3d 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
73 N.Y.S.3d 422
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 3448

Citing Cases

Rosario v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant's caused or had…

De Jesus v. Roban Corp.

Defendants established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, in this action where plaintiff…