From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moreno v. Moreno

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 5, 1996
674 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

In Moreno and Hurtado, the entitlement award was part of the final judgment on appeal but there had not yet been a determination of the amount of fees.

Summary of this case from Ritchie v. Ritchie

Opinion

No. 95-2331.

June 5, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Robert M. Gross, Judge. L.T. Case No. CD 93-7155 FD.

George L. Moreno, Lantana, pro se.

Rae Franks of Rae Franks, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant/Husband appeals from final judgment of dissolution. We affirm in all respects except as to attorney's fees. We dismiss Husband's challenge to the attorney's fee award to Wife because the amount of fees has not been set by the trial court and the award is therefore not ripe for our consideration. See Hurtado v. Hurtado, 407 So.2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moreno v. Moreno

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 5, 1996
674 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

In Moreno and Hurtado, the entitlement award was part of the final judgment on appeal but there had not yet been a determination of the amount of fees.

Summary of this case from Ritchie v. Ritchie
Case details for

Moreno v. Moreno

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE L. MORENO, APPELLANT, v. MARIA D. MORENO, A/K/A MARIA D. GONZALEZ…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 5, 1996

Citations

674 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Ritchie v. Ritchie

We distinguish this case, as well as Widom, Easley andPatsy, from cases where this court has declined, based…