Morales v. Sherman

Full title: OSCAR MORALES, Petitioner, v. STU SHERMAN, et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 30, 2015

2:12-cv-0544 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2015)

Opinion

OSCAR MORALES, Petitioner, v. STU SHERMAN, et al., Respondents. No. 2:12-cv-0544 TLN KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 30, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On December 17, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 17, 2014, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's motions for an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 45) and witness immunity (ECF No. 46) are denied.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.