From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Brown

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Mar 17, 2015
1:14-CV-01717-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          Raymond P. Boucher, Hermez Moreno, BOUCHER LLP FELDMAN & WALLACH, Woodland Hills, California,

          Mark A. Ozzello, Suzy E. Lee, ARIAS, OZZELLO, & GIGNAC, LLP, Los Angeles, CA Attorneys for Plaintiff, Miguel Angel Sanchez Morales

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, Supervising Deputy Attorney General.

          JON S. ALLIN, Deputy Attorney General, Attorneys for Defendants Beard, Cate, and Biter.


          JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE APRIL 7, 2015 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

          STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.

         By and through their respective counsel, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

         WHEREAS, on February 20, 2015, the Court entered an Order Setting Scheduling Conference, pursuant to which the parties must meet and confer on a discovery plan by March 18, 2015 (ECF No. 15);

         WHEREAS, on March 12, 2015, Judge Boone signed the proposed order providing Defendants Beard, Cate, and Biter until March 19, 2015 to file a responsive pleading (ECF No. 17), and Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss;

         WHEREAS, Defendants Brown and Hedgpeth have not yet been served or appeared in the action;

         WHEREAS, counsel for the parties agree that a continuance is warranted to allow Plaintiffs adequate time to review and evaluate Defendants' response to the Complaint prior to meeting and conferring regarding scheduling;

         WHEREAS, counsel for the parties further agree that judicial economy will be best served if the Scheduling Conference is continued for sixty (60) days to allow the Court to rule on the motion to dismiss Defendants intend to file and to allow adequate time for a meaningful conference of the parties;

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court continue the Scheduling Conference and any deadlines pertaining thereto for sixty (60) days.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby approves this Stipulation by and between the parties and continues the Scheduling Conference to June 15, 2015 at 9:00 am before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morales v. Brown

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Mar 17, 2015
1:14-CV-01717-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Morales v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ MORALES, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

1:14-CV-01717-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015)