From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Barnhart

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2005
No. 05 Civ. 3244 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05 Civ. 3244 (LAK).

June 2, 2005

DAVID N. KELLEY, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, JOHN E. GURA, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, New York, New York.

ROSEMARY LOPEZ MORALES o/b/o GENESIS REYES JOMARY, Plaintiff pro se New York, New York.


STIPULATION AND ORDER


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorney for the defendant and the plaintiff pro se, that the defendant's time to answer or move with respect to the complaint in the above-captioned action is extended from June 14, 2005 to and including August 15, 2005. The reason for the request is that the administrative record has not yet been received by defendant's counsel. No prior extension has been requested in this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Morales v. Barnhart

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 2, 2005
No. 05 Civ. 3244 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2005)
Case details for

Morales v. Barnhart

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARY LOPEZ MORALES GENESIS REYES JOMARY, Plaintiff, v. JO ANNE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 2, 2005

Citations

No. 05 Civ. 3244 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 2, 2005)