From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morad Assocs., Llc. v. Lee

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2013
112 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-10

MORAD ASSOCIATES, LLC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. JAY SUNG LEE, Defendant–Appellant.

Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP, New York (Andrew S. Kowlowitz of counsel), for appellant. Baxter, Smith & Shapiro, P.C., Hicksville (Margot Ludlam of counsel), for respondent.


Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP, New York (Andrew S. Kowlowitz of counsel), for appellant. Baxter, Smith & Shapiro, P.C., Hicksville (Margot Ludlam of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about October 9, 2012, which, in this action alleging legal malpractice, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence submitted by defendant attorney, while showing that he may not be liable for a large measure of the damages assessed against plaintiff, failed to establish as a matter of law that his alleged negligence was not the cause of at least some of those damages. In addition to the damage to the property of plaintiff's tenant, plaintiff was also assessed damages for wrongful eviction for which defendant may be held liable. We find no basis for holding defendant liable for any damages plaintiff incurred when its agents destroyed the tenant's property. TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ACOSTA, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Morad Assocs., Llc. v. Lee

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 10, 2013
112 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Morad Assocs., Llc. v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:MORAD ASSOCIATES, LLC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. JAY SUNG LEE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8204
975 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

McHenry v. Bader, Yakaitis & Nonnenmacher, LLP

Defendants, had they served San Miguel at his correct address, show neither (1) that he still would have…