From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MORA v. CAMDEN COUNTY

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 21, 2010
Civil No. 09-4183 (JBS) (D.N.J. Jun. 21, 2010)

Summary

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Estrella v. Kelsey

Opinion

Civil No. 09-4183 (JBS).

June 21, 2010


ORDER


For the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 21st day of June, 2010,

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause (Docket Item #22) is DISCHARGED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff Grohs' motion (Docket Item #14) to construe the matter as a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, without prejudice to the filing of an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of the entry of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff Grohs' motion (Docket Item #14) to certify a class is DENIED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' cross motion (Docket Item #21) to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) and 56 is DENIED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that, if Plaintiff files an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of the entry of this Order, then the Court will enter an order reopening the file and screening the amended complaint for dismissal; and it is finally

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order and the accompanying Opinion on the parties, and shall close the file.


Summaries of

MORA v. CAMDEN COUNTY

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 21, 2010
Civil No. 09-4183 (JBS) (D.N.J. Jun. 21, 2010)

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Estrella v. Kelsey

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Valentine v. Kelsey

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Washington v. Kelsey

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Smith v. Kelsey

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Reyes v. Kelsey

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Hunter v. Passaic Cnty. Jail

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Williams v. Camden Cnty. (Prison) - CCCF Corr. Facility

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Brooks v. Camden Cnty. Jail

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Coles v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Toomer v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Coles v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility

applying Helling to pretrial detainee

Summary of this case from Alpheaus v. Camden Cnty. Corr. Facility

explaining that a prisoner must "allege facts showing that the deprivation of a nutritionally adequate diet was sufficiently serious (regarding the amount and the duration of the malnutrition)"

Summary of this case from Brown v. May

applying Helling to claim raised under the Fourteenth Amendment

Summary of this case from Grohs v. Santiago

applying Bell to claim of inadequate nutrition

Summary of this case from Duran v. Merline
Case details for

MORA v. CAMDEN COUNTY

Case Details

Full title:WILFREDO MORA, Plaintiff, v. CAMDEN COUNTY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-4183 (JBS) (D.N.J. Jun. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Camden Cnty. (Prison) - CCCF Corr. Facility

Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 32 (1993). See also Mora v. Camden Cnty., No. 09-4183, 2010 WL 2560680, at…

White v. Taylor

) They contend that "plaintiff is alleging minor deviations from the menu that do not rise to a…