From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mootry v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01252-LJO-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01252-LJO-BAM PC

04-17-2013

MICHAEL MOOTRY, Plaintiff, v. E. G. FLORES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT (ECF Nos. 64, 66)


THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Michael Mootry ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second amended complaint for failure to state a claim be DENIED, and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second amended complaint based on qualified immunity be DENIED without prejudice. The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. More than fourteen (14) days have passed and no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the undersigned finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, issued March 26, 2013, are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, filed July 5, 2012, is DENIED;
3. Defendants' motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity is DENIED without prejudice; and
4. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Defendants shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mootry v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01252-LJO-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Mootry v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MOOTRY, Plaintiff, v. E. G. FLORES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01252-LJO-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2013)