From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Union Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Dec 5, 2022
3:21-CV-158-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-158-DMB-JMV

12-05-2022

RICHARD MOORE PLAINTIFF v. UNION COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

DEBRA M. BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 17, 2022, over two months after denying without prejudice Richard Moore's motion for default judgment against Courtland Tanner Vaughn, the Court ordered Moore to show cause “within fourteen (14) days .. why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)” and cautioned Moore “that failure to respond ... will result in dismissal of his claims against Vaughan [sic].” Moore did not respond to the Court's order within the time allowed. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Moore's claims against Vaughn are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Vaughn is the only remaining defendant in this case. See Doc. #55 (granting motion to dismiss other named defendants).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Union Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division
Dec 5, 2022
3:21-CV-158-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Moore v. Union Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD MOORE PLAINTIFF v. UNION COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Oxford Division

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-158-DMB-JMV (N.D. Miss. Dec. 5, 2022)