From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 27, 2007
960 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D06-4981.

June 27, 2007.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-18944 CF10A.

Stacey Moore, Immokalee, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The trial court's order summarily denying post conviction relief following appellant's motion and supplemental motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed. However, affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's right to file in the trial court within thirty (30) days of this court's mandate an amendment to his motion only as to claim one in the supplement, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to investigate, depose and call for trial Dominique Tukes and Tonia Moore. Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2004). The amendment shall address the requirement of a pleading of the availability of the witnesses. Id. at 583-84. If an amended motion is filed, then the trial court shall either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach record evidence which conclusively refutes appellant's claim.

Affirmed.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 27, 2007
960 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stacey MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 27, 2007

Citations

960 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Moore v. State

PER CURIAM. Appellant Stacey Moore appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his amended motion for…