From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 26, 2007
No. 03-05-00690-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2007)

Summary

granting motion to withdraw filed by court-appointed counsel unable to provide a copy of his Anders brief to appellant because her whereabouts were unknown

Summary of this case from V.M. v. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.

Opinion

No. 03-05-00690-CR

Filed: September 26, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Travis County, No. 712007, Honorable Mike Denton, Judge Presiding.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices WALDROP and HENSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Dana Moore pleaded no contest to an information accusing her of prostitution. The trial court adjudged her guilty and imposed a ten-day jail sentence. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 43.02 (West 2003). Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). In his brief, counsel states that he was unable to deliver a copy of his brief to appellant or advise her of her right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief because her whereabouts are unknown. See Sutherland v. State, 658 S.W.2d 169, 170 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983). No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Affirmed

Appellant's counsel on appeal was appointed eighteen months after appellant's trial, after appellant's original counsel failed to file a brief.

The record consists of the clerk's record only. No reporter was present at the proceedings in the trial court.

The clerk's record contains the magistrate's order committing appellant to the sheriff's custody pending the posting of bail. The order shows appellant's address as "transient."


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 26, 2007
No. 03-05-00690-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2007)

granting motion to withdraw filed by court-appointed counsel unable to provide a copy of his Anders brief to appellant because her whereabouts were unknown

Summary of this case from V.M. v. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dana Moore, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Sep 26, 2007

Citations

No. 03-05-00690-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

V.M. v. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs.

We also grant counsel's motion to withdraw. See Moore v. State, No. 03-05-00690-CR, 2007 WL 2811971, *1…

Garrett v. State

" We will not delay disposition of this appeal simply because Garrett refuses to accept correspondence from…