From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Sep 15, 2011
803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)

Opinion

No. 20110052.

Decided September 15, 2011.

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John Charles Irby, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Anthony James Moore (on brief), self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521, petitioner and appellant.

Birch P. Burdick (on brief), State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.


Per Curiam.


[¶ 1] Anthony Moore appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief filed on December 30, 2010. On appeal, Moore alleges North Dakota is in non-compliance with federal public law 109-248. Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub.L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901- 16991 (2006)). Moore argues he is improperly categorized as a sex offender subject to a lifetime registration requirement, and he should be re-sentenced under federal public law 109-248 to a reduced registration requirement. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Sep 15, 2011
803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony James Moore, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

803 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 2011)
2011 N.D. 179

Citing Cases

Moore v. Bertsch

.S.C. § 1915(g) and is manipulating it to serve his ends."McNeil v. United States, 2006 WL 581081, at n. 3.…