From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 12, 1951
244 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)

Opinion

No. 25559.

December 12, 1951.

Appeal from the County Court, Martin County, James McMorries, J.

Thomas Thomas, Big Spring, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The information upon which this prosecution rested was sufficient to charge the unlawful transportation of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.

That there were other charges in the same count of the information charging or attempting to charge the unlawful transportation of the beer, without reference to the dry or wet status of the area, would not render the information duplicitous, because different phases of the same offense; that is, the unlawful transportation of beer, may be charged conjunctively in the same count. Branch's Penal Code, Section 508.

The statement of facts fails to evidence the dry status of Martin County, especially the publication order putting local option in effect. Baldridge v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. R., 106 S.W.2d 700; Craig v. State, 145 Tex.Crim. R., 167 S.W.2d 523; Langston v. State, 146 Tex.Crim. R., 171 S.W.2d 371.

The facts being insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Moore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 12, 1951
244 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
Case details for

Moore v. State

Case Details

Full title:MOORE v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 12, 1951

Citations

244 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951)
156 Tex. Crim. 512

Citing Cases

Tackett v. State

Notice to the public of the result of such election is a prerequisite.' See also Moore v. State, 156 …

Hardy v. State

We also observe that no proof was offered that the order of the Commissioners Court declaring the results of…