Moore v. State

Full title: JOE E. MOORE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 9, 2004

874 So. 2d 727 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D04-963.

Opinion filed June 9, 2004.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b) (2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 97-16606.

Joe E. Moore, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Johnson v. State, 763 So.2d 283, 284-85 (Fla. 2000) ("Prior to the amendments produced by chapter 95-182, robbery was one of the qualifying offenses which allowed a trial court to sentence a defendant as a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(1)(b)1.c., Fla. Stat. (1993). Thus, Johnson would have qualified as a habitual violent felony offender prior to the amendments reflected in chapter 95-182. . . . In sum, we find that Johnson was not affected by the passage of chapter 95-182.").