From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Skywalk Fresno, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2013
No. 1:12-cv-00741-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cv-00741-BAM

03-01-2013

RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. SKYWALK FRESNO, LLC, et al., Defendants.

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore Ryan L. Eddings Attorneys for Defendant Skywalk Fresno, LLC


K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Skywalk Fresno, LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

______________________

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

LITTLER MENDELSON, PC

______________________

Ryan L. Eddings

Attorneys for Defendant Skywalk Fresno,

LLC

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal filed on March 1, 2013 by Plaintiff Ronald Moore, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Skywalk Fresno, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 1, 2013
No. 1:12-cv-00741-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Skywalk Fresno, LLC

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. SKYWALK FRESNO, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cv-00741-BAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2013)