From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
Case No. 1:13-CV-00351-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-CV-00351-LJO-SMS

04-30-2013

RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. PARAMJIT SINGH, individually and dba BUY RITE LIQUORS; RAVINDER SINGH; JOSE LUIS SERRANO, dba EL BAJIO RESTAURANT Defendants.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Frank R. Chimienti Attorney for Defendant


Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RONALD MOORE

SECOND STIPULATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff RONALD MOORE ("Plaintiff") and Defendants PARAMJIT SINGH, individually and dba BUY RITE LIQUORS; RAVINDER SINGH; and JOSE LUIS SERRANO, dba EL BAJIO RESTAURANT ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 144(a), Defendants may have to and including May 22, 2013 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. Plaintiff and Defendants previously stipulated to an extension of time to May 3, 2013. This second extension of time will exceed 28 days.

Defendants request this extension to afford them the time to have the subject property inspected by a Certified Access Specialist which is scheduled to take place on May 10, 2013, and to thereafter pursue settlement with Plaintiff prior to incurring any additional fees. This extension does not affect any date or event set by court order.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

____________

Tanya E. Moore

Attorney for Plaintiff

____________

Frank R. Chimienti

Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all named defendants shall have to and including May 22, 2013 within which to file responding pleadings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 30, 2013
Case No. 1:13-CV-00351-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. PARAMJIT SINGH, individually and dba BUY RITE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-CV-00351-LJO-SMS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2013)