In Moore v. Title and Trust Co., 82 Md. 290, it was held, that as it was not necessary, in that case, to record the deed of trust to affect the fund in controversy, the provisions of section 205 of the Code did not apply.
Summary of this case from Cummings v. WildmanJune, 1931.
Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs.
In Moore v. Title and Trust Co., 82 Md. 290, it was held, that as it was not necessary, in that case, to record the deed of trust to affect the fund in controversy, the provisions of section 205 of the Code did not apply.
Summary of this case from Cummings v. WildmanIn Moore v. Title and Trust Company, 82 Md. 292, this Court said in construing this statute, the bond required by the statute was to be filed with the Clerk of the Court in which the deed or instrument creating the trust is to be recorded and that if the deed is not required to be recorded at all, then no bond is to be given.
Summary of this case from United Railways & Electric Co. v. RoweFull title:ELIZABETH A. MOORE, as Executrix, etc., of the Estate of ALBERT H. MOORE…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1931
Nor was any attempt made to comply with the law of Delaware as to such assignments, where the debtor was…
United Railways & Electric Co. v. RoweWe cannot agree that it was necessary to record this assignment from Mrs. Swindell to Mr. Stewart to make it…