Moore v. Raught

Full title: KENNETH E. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. C/O J. RAUGHT, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 31, 2010

CV 07-3836 VBF (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2010)

Opinion

KENNETH E. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. C/O J. RAUGHT, et al., Defendants. No. CV 07-3836 VBF (FMO). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 31, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. Judgment shall be entered dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant Pemberton with prejudice and his claims against defendant Raught without prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on all parties.