From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Nayer

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 16, 2000
752 A.2d 1289 (N.J. 2000)

Summary

stating that the presumption of responsibility arising from ICC numbers is rebuttable

Summary of this case from Agricultural Insurance Company v. Scott

Opinion

A-14 September Term 1999, 48,156

February 28, 2000, Decided . May 16, 2000, Filed


ORDER

The parties having stipulated to a dismissal of this matter and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 28th day of February 2000.


Summaries of

Moore v. Nayer

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 16, 2000
752 A.2d 1289 (N.J. 2000)

stating that the presumption of responsibility arising from ICC numbers is rebuttable

Summary of this case from Agricultural Insurance Company v. Scott
Case details for

Moore v. Nayer

Case Details

Full title:SERAFINA MOORE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. PRITER N. NAYER, ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 16, 2000

Citations

752 A.2d 1289 (N.J. 2000)
752 A.2d 1287
164 N.J. 187
2000 N.J. LEXIS 772

Citing Cases

Willey v. DD Transport

Observing that the worker would be fully compensated for his injuries regardless of which insurer was held…

Imo Indus. Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.

In fact, we have in the past observed that “[o]ur courts appear to have used the terms self-insured retention…