From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Mora

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
1:15-cv-00508-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)

Opinion

          James D. Burnside III, DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED, Fresno, CA, Attorneys for Defendants SAMUEL A. LUCIDO, Trustee of the SAMUEL AND LINDA LUCIDO LIVING TRUST, under declaration of trust dated 12-5-06; LINDA A. LUCIDO, Trustee of the SAMUEL AND LINDA LUCIDO LIVING TRUST, under declaration of trust dated 12-5-06.

          MOORE LAW FIRM P.C., TANYA E. MOORE, Attorneys for Plaintiff RONALD MOORE.

          CHIELPEGIAN LAW OFFICES, A Professional Corporation, LEE S.W. COBB, Attorneys for Defendant Alex De La Mora dba Colima's Fade Shop.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

          STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.

         STIPULATION

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff in this action is pursuing remedies based on allegations of denial of right of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Plaintiff alleges that both Colima's Fade Shop, 7277 North Blackstone Avenue, Pinedale, CA 93650, and the shopping center itself fail to comply with legal requirements concerning wheelchair access.

         The parties have succeeded in reaching a tentative agreement on injunctive relief. They continue to negotiate over monetary relief. So as to allow the parties sufficient time to complete their settlement negotiations, it is requested the Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for August 25, 2015, be continued six weeks.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to continuing the Mandatory Scheduling Conference from August 25, 2015, to July 29, 2015

          ORDER

         Upon reviewing the stipulation of counsel and good cause appearing,

         IT IS ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued from August 25, 2015, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 9, to October 5, 2015, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 9, with telephonic appearances approved as they were for the August 25th date. The Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed at least one full week prior to the continued scheduling conference date.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Mora

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
1:15-cv-00508-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Moore v. Mora

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. ALEX DE LA MORA dba COLIMA'S FADE SHOP; SAMUEL…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-00508-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)