From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Mars Petcare U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 21, 2024
3:16-cv-7001-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2024)

Opinion

3:16-cv-7001-MMC

02-21-2024

TAMARA MOORE, et al,, Plaintiffs, v. MARS PETCARE US, INC, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS TAMARA MOORE, NICHOLS SMITH, AND CYNTHIA WELTON'S MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL SUR-REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AS TO DEFENDANT HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge

Following Supplemental briefing Ordered by the Court, Plaintiffs Tamara Moore, Nichols Smith, and Cynthia elton moved for Leave of Court to File a Supplemental Sur-Reply in support of their Motion for Class Certification as to Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition. Because Plaintiffs have the burden on class certification, the Court will grant leave for Plaintiffs to file a short sur-reply, not to exceed 6 pages.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave of Court to File Supplemental Sur-Reply is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are instructed to file their Sur-

Reply as a separate docket entry within two (2) business days of the entry of this ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Mars Petcare U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 21, 2024
3:16-cv-7001-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Moore v. Mars Petcare U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAMARA MOORE, et al,, Plaintiffs, v. MARS PETCARE US, INC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 21, 2024

Citations

3:16-cv-7001-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2024)