From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Hinds Invs., L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01593-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01593-LJO-BAM

02-28-2013

RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.; LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, L.L.C. dba CVS PHARMACY; SMART & FINAL STORES, LLC dba SMART & FINAL #412; PETSMART, INC. dba PETSMART #0083; LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC.; BIG FIVE CORPORATION dba BIG FIVE SPORTING GOODS #101, Defendants.

COLEMAN & HOROWITT Keith M. White Attorneys for Defendant, HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P. MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff, RONALD MOORE


DARRYL J. HOROWITT #100898
KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 248-4820
Facsimile: (559) 248-4830
Attorneys for Defendant,
HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff RONALD MOORE ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, Tanya E. Moore of Moore Law Firm, P.C., and Defendant HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P. ("Hinds"), by and through his counsel of record., Keith M. White of Coleman & Horowitt, LLP hereby stipulate as follows:

1. That Plaintiff and Hinds are working diligently toward an informal resolution of this matter.

2. That according to counsel for Hinds: Hinds has hired a Certified Access Specialist ("CASp") who has performed a survey of the exterior of the property at issue, a large shopping center located at Shaw and Clovis Avenue; Hinds has retained a contractor to work with the CASp to prepare a remediation plan; and that a draft of the remediation plan is expected the week of March 4, 2013.

3. Plaintiff and Hinds wish the additional time to allow for the review and revision of the forthcoming remediation plan in order to see if an informal resolution of the matter can be reached.

4. That neither Plaintiff or Hinds wish to burden the Court or themselves with appearing at the currently calendared Scheduling Conference on March 6, 2013, at 8:30 a.m. pending further attempts at an informal resolution of the case and request that the Court continue the currently set Scheduling Conference approximately 45 days to allow Hinds and Plaintiff the opportunity to informally resolve the case.

COLEMAN & HOROWITT

By:________________

Keith M. White

Attorneys for Defendant,

HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By:________________

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

RONALD MOORE

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the stipulation of the parties and finding that good cause exists hereby ORDERS the March 6, 2013, Scheduling Conference is vacated and reset for April 15, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Hinds Invs., L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01593-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Hinds Invs., L.P.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.; LONGS DRUG STORES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-CV-01593-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)