From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Fresno Shaw Blackstone, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 13, 2013
13-CV-00528 AWI (GSAx) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)

Opinion

          STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT AL BAWADI, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON ORDER

          GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff Ronald Moore, by and through his undersigned counsel, and Defendant Al Bawadi, Inc. dba Elbasha Mediterranean Grill & Hookah (collectively "the Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree as follows:

         WHEREAS, Defendant Al Bawadi, Inc. dba Elbasha Mediterranean Grill & Hookah ("Al Bawadi, Inc.") was served on April 24, 2013;

          Tanya E. Moore, State Bar No. 206683, MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., San Jose, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore.

          Ryan M. McNamara, State Bar No. 223606, CALL & JENSEN, A Professional Corporation, Newport Beach, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Fresno Shaw Blackstone, LLC, Bertao Family Industries, Inc. dba Papa Murphy's, Al Bawadi, Inc. dba Elbasha Mediterranean Grill & Hookah, Dimas Manuel Inc. dba Ramos Furniture Home Store, Four Brothers, Inc., dba Ramos Furniture Home Store and Ali Abdullah dba U.S. Furniture.

          WHEREAS, a stipulation to extend the initial response deadline for Defendants Al Bawadi, Inc., Bertao Family Industries, Inc., Dimas Manuel Inc., Four Brothers, Inc. and Fresno Shaw Blackstone, LLC was filed on May 13, 2013 extending the deadline to June 10, 2013;


         WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have engaged in successful settlement negotiations since the filing of the initial stipulations to extend time and are in the process of finalizing resolution of this dispute as between them;

         WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties desire to conserve the resources of the Court as well as their own respective resources by avoiding incurring additional attorneys' fees and costs associated with responsive filings which will likely prove unnecessary due to settlement;

         WHEREAS, having good cause, the Parties jointly request additional time to allow the Parties to finalize resolution of this dispute as between them;

         NOW THEREFORE, is it hereby stipulated that Defendant Al Bawadi, Inc. shall have to and including July 8, 2013 to respond or otherwise move this Court regarding the Complaint.

          ORDER

         Based on the Stipulation of the Parties included above (also at Doc. 18), and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Al Bawadi, Inc. shall have up to and including July 8, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this matter.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Fresno Shaw Blackstone, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 13, 2013
13-CV-00528 AWI (GSAx) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Fresno Shaw Blackstone, LLC

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. FRESNO SHAW BLACKSTONE, LLC, a California…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

13-CV-00528 AWI (GSAx) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)