From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. California-Fresno Investment Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2013
1:13-cv-00596-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)

Opinion

          Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683, K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933, MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C., Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald Moore.

          DENNIS C. HUIE, (SBN 184377), SUHANI KAMDAR, (SBN 218141), ROGERS JOSEPH O'DONNELL, Attorneys for Defendant California-Fresno Investment Company.


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

          GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

         WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set in this matter for September 25, 2013; at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #10;

         WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff, Ronald Moore ("Plaintiff"), must appear at a motion for summary judgment in the Eastern District, Sacramento, at the time of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this case and will be unable to attend;

         WHEREAS, this Court has advised that October 7, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. is available for a continued Mandatory Scheduling Conference and counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant, California-Fresno Investment Company ("Defendant") have both confirmed their availability at that time;

         THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, that the September 25, 2013 Mandatory Scheduling Conference be continued to 9:30 a.m. on October 7, 2013 in Courtroom #10, or to a later date depending on the Court's availability.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         The parties having stipulated and good cause appearing,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is continued from 10:00 a.m. on September 25, 2013 in Courtroom 10 to 9:30 a.m. on October 7, 2013 in Courtroom 10. The Parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. California-Fresno Investment Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 16, 2013
1:13-cv-00596-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. California-Fresno Investment Co.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA-FRESNO INVESTMENT COMPANY, a…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 16, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-00596-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2013)