From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3059 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3059 KJN P

01-08-2013

THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, Plaintiff, v. R. BROWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Review of court records reveals that on at least three occasions lawsuits filed by the plaintiff have been dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Orders filed in the following cases on the following dates:

+------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Case Number ¦Title ¦Order Issued ¦ +-------------+----------------------------------+-----------------¦ ¦01-cv-2003 ¦GEB DAD Moore v. McElheney, et al.¦December 20, 2001¦ +-------------+----------------------------------+-----------------¦ ¦01-cv-2180 ¦FCD DAD Moore v. Twomey ¦July 15, 2002 ¦ +-------------+----------------------------------+-----------------¦ ¦02-cv-0176 ¦FCD PAN Moore v. Three Strikes ¦December 16, 2003¦ +------------------------------------------------------------------+

+---------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦04-cv-0314¦MCE DAD Moore v. Rimmer ¦December 15, 2005¦ +----------+----------------------------------+-----------------¦ ¦06-cv-2755¦FCD EFB Moore v. Sacramento County¦August 12, 2008 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------+

Plaintiff is therefore precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action unless plaintiff is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff has not alleged any facts which suggest that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, plaintiff must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-one days from the date of this order, the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

____________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-3059 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, Plaintiff, v. R. BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3059 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)