From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Board of Education

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Feb 9, 1950
96 Cal.App.2d 28 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)

Opinion

Docket No. 14159.

February 9, 1950.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Milton D. Sapiro, Judge. Affirmed.

Proceeding in mandamus to compel a board of education and superintendent of schools to pay for services performed under a contract. Judgment for defendants affirmed.

John C. Moore, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Irving G. Breyer for Respondents.


Appellant petitioned for a writ of mandate to compel respondents to pay him $9,300 alleged to be due for services performed under a contract. The contract is alleged to be evidenced by a letter which contains the following provision:

"The entire amount of the bid $9,300 to be raised by private means, without cost or obligation on part of the Board of Education, by a committee to be subsequently appointed."

[1] Apart from any other consideration it appears that respondents promised to pay nothing (except the nominal sum of $1.00 in a following sentence) and appellant agreed to look to a voluntary committee later to be formed for his compensation. Respondents' demurrer was therefore properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Nourse, P.J., and Goodell, J., concurred.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 30, 1950.


Summaries of

Moore v. Board of Education

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Feb 9, 1950
96 Cal.App.2d 28 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)
Case details for

Moore v. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. MOORE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 9, 1950

Citations

96 Cal.App.2d 28 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)
214 P.2d 70