From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 25, 2013
2:13-cv-0655-JCM-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 25, 2013)

Opinion

2:13-cv-0655-JCM-CWH

04-25-2013

RANDOLPH L. MOORE, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Randolph L. Moore, a Nevada prisoner under sentence of death. Moore filed a pro se habeas corpus petition (ECF No. 1) on April 18, 2013. He paid the $5 filing fee.

Despite the fact that he paid the $5 filing fee, Moore also filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3). In view of the information provided in that application regarding his financial status, the court will grant Moore's motion in part and deny it in part. The court will not waive payment of the $5 filing fee, but, based on the information in his application, will grant Moore leave to proceed in forma pauperis with respect to subsequent fees and costs.

In addition, Moore filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 4). The information provided in Moore's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis shows that he lacks the resources necessary to employ counsel for this capital habeas corpus action. Therefore, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599, and in the interests of justice, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) shall be appointed to represent Moore. If the FPD is unable to represent Moore, due to a conflict of interest or other reason, then alternate counsel will be located and appointed by the court. Moore's appointed counsel will represent him in all subsequent proceedings, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599(e), unless and until allowed to withdraw.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED with respect to waiver of payment of the filing fee, but GRANTED with respect to subsequent fees and costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada is appointed to represent petitioner. The federal public defender shall have 30 days from the date of entry of this order to undertake representation of petitioner or to indicate to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send a copy of this order to Michael Pescetta, Capital Habeas Division, Office of the Federal Public Defender, 411 East Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250, Las Vegas, NV 89101.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall SERVE the respondents, by certified mail, with a copy of this order and a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' counsel shall file a notice of appearance of counsel within 30 days from the date of entry of this order. Respondents need not respond to the habeas corpus petition unless and until ordered by the court to do so.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 25, 2013
2:13-cv-0655-JCM-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Moore v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH L. MOORE, Petitioner, v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-0655-JCM-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 25, 2013)