From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Aug 30, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00193-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00193-MP-WCS.

August 30, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 21, Report and Recommendation regarding the Complaint, Doc. 1. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the decision of the Commissioner to deny benefits be affirmed. No party has objected, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 21, is ADOPTED and incorporated herein.
2. The decision of the Commissioner to deny benefits is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moore v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Aug 30, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00193-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Moore v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TINA L MOORE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00193-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Adzima v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff makes no specific argument as to what she would have offered had she been allowed to further rebut…