From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mooney v. AT&T Umbrella Ben. Plan No. 1

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 15, 2010
367 F. App'x 723 (8th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-1929.

Submitted: March 5, 2010.

Filed: March 15, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Homer Mooney, Conway, AR, pro se.

James Warren Stanley, Jr., Stanley Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Appellant.

Joann C. Maxey, Michael Muskheli, Williams Anderson, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Homer Mooney appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his Employment Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit against AT T Umbrella Benefit Plan # 1 (the Plan) arising from the denial of long-term-disability (LTD) benefits. Upon de novo review of the record, we agree with the district court that the Plan did not abuse its discretion in denying Mooney's claim for LTD disability benefits. See Dillard's Inc. v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston,

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

456 F.3d 894, 899 (8th Cir. 2006) (plan administrator's decision will be reversed only if it was arbitrary and capricious; decision need be only reasonable, meaning it must be supported by substantial evidence); see also Norris v. Citibank, N.A. Disability Plan (501), 308 F.3d 880, 883-84 (8th Cir. 2002) (reviewing de novo district court's application of abuse-of-discretion standard). Accordingly, we affirm, and we reject as meritless Mooney's arguments for reversal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Mooney v. AT&T Umbrella Ben. Plan No. 1

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 15, 2010
367 F. App'x 723 (8th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Mooney v. AT&T Umbrella Ben. Plan No. 1

Case Details

Full title:Homer MOONEY, Appellant, v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN # 1, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2010

Citations

367 F. App'x 723 (8th Cir. 2010)