From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. Newland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Aug 14, 2019
CIV. NO. 18-5363 (RMB) (D.N.J. Aug. 14, 2019)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 18-5363 (RMB)

08-14-2019

HAROLD MOODY, Plaintiff v. R. NEWLAND, MD/CD, et al., Defendants


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUN AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Mot. for Default Judgment, ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff filed this Bivens action on April 3, 2018. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On August 16, 2018, the Court screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b), and permitted the Bivens claims against Dr. Newland, Dr. Sceusa, and MLP Vicente to proceed, and dismissed the Bivens claim against Dr. Thomas without prejudice. (Opinion, ECF No. 6; Order, ECF No. 7.)

Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against Defendants Newland, Sceusa and Vicente. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, the Court cannot grant a motion for default judgment until default is entered.

IT IS therefore on this 14th day of August 2019 ,

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (ECF No. 29) is denied without prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

s/Renée Marie Bumb

RENÉE MARIE BUMB

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Moody v. Newland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Aug 14, 2019
CIV. NO. 18-5363 (RMB) (D.N.J. Aug. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Moody v. Newland

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD MOODY, Plaintiff v. R. NEWLAND, MD/CD, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Date published: Aug 14, 2019

Citations

CIV. NO. 18-5363 (RMB) (D.N.J. Aug. 14, 2019)