From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. NetChoice, LLC

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 16, 2024
No. 22-277 (U.S. Feb. 16, 2024)

Summary

In NetChoice, two states enacted laws addressing perceived bias against conservative viewpoints on large social-media platforms like YouTube and Facebook.

Summary of this case from TikTok Inc. v. Garland

Opinion

22-277

02-16-2024

MOODY, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL. v. NETCHOICE, LLC, ET AL.


ORDER

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.


Summaries of

Moody v. NetChoice, LLC

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 16, 2024
No. 22-277 (U.S. Feb. 16, 2024)

In NetChoice, two states enacted laws addressing perceived bias against conservative viewpoints on large social-media platforms like YouTube and Facebook.

Summary of this case from TikTok Inc. v. Garland

In Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 144 S.Ct. 2383 (2024), the Supreme Court emphasized that facial challenges to state laws are difficult to successfully mount.

Summary of this case from NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton

stating that exercising editorial discretion in the selection and presentation of content is speech activity

Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Google LLC

considering whether a Florida statute that limited social media platforms' capacities to engage in content moderation violated the First Amendment

Summary of this case from Ryan v. X Corp

In Moody, the Supreme Court dealt with separate challenges to new Texas and Florida social media laws that regulated online platforms' ability to engage in content moderation.

Summary of this case from Comput. & Commc'ns Indus. Ass'n v. Paxton

In Moody v. Netchoice, the plaintiff mounted facial attacks against state laws recently passed in Florida and Texas that sought to regulate content moderation on social-media platforms.

Summary of this case from McAllister v. Clark Cnty.

noting that, to properly analyze whether a law substantially burdens First Amendment activity, “a court must understand what kind of government actions the First Amendment prohibits”

Summary of this case from McAllister v. Clark Cnty.
Case details for

Moody v. NetChoice, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MOODY, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL. v. NETCHOICE, LLC, ET AL.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

No. 22-277 (U.S. Feb. 16, 2024)

Citing Cases

TikTok Inc. v. Garland

The User Petitioners have not demonstrated that "a substantial number of" the Act's "applications are…

Mont. Pub. Interest Research Grp. v. Jacobsen

To prevail on an overbreadth challenge in the First Amendment context, a party must demonstrate that "a…